THU · JUL 16 · 16:50 · KRIEGER 170 · ZOOM

Relative differential categories, differential clones and Fermat theories

Jean-Baptiste Vienney

A differential category [2] is a symmetric monoidal category (𝒞,⊗,I) enriched over commutative monoids, together with a monad S on 𝒞 and a differentiation operator d:S⁢A→S⁢A⊗A satisfying standard axioms. Relative monads are a generalization of monads where the underlying functor is not necessarily an endofunctor [1]. Our main contribution in this talk is the introduction of the notion of a relative differential category where the monad is replaced by a relative monad. Every differential category is a relative differential category but the converse is false. An example is 𝖵𝖾𝖼k with its usual tensor product and with S⁢(n)=k⁢[x1,…,xn]. Another one is 𝖵𝖾𝖼ℝ with its usual tensor product and with S⁢(n)=C∞⁢(ℝn,ℝ). This framework allows one to work directly with polynomials and smooth functions, instead of using coordinate-free constructions such as the symmetric algebra.

These two examples can be generalized using clones [3]. A rig clone 𝒪 is given by a commutative rig 𝒪⁢(n) for every n≥0 together with projections and composition operations satisfying familiar identities. We introduce the notion of a differential clone as a rig clone together with partial derivative operations ∂i:𝒪⁢(n)→𝒪⁢(n). Differential clones are equivalent to the differential theories of [2]. For every differential clone, the symmetric monoidal category (Mod𝒪⁢(0),⊗,𝒪⁢(0)) is a relative differential category. In particular, we recover our two previous examples of relative differential categories by choosing 𝒪⁢(n)=k⁢[x1,…,xn] or 𝒪⁢(n)=𝒞∞⁢(ℝn,ℝ).

A Fermat theory [4] is a ring clone where differentiation is axiomatized algebraically through difference quotients. We show that every Fermat theory is a differential clone. The differential clones 𝒪⁢(n)=k⁢[x1,…,xn] and 𝒪⁢(n)=C∞⁢(ℝn,ℝ) are Fermat theories. However, not every differential clone is a Fermat theory and we provide a counterexample inspired from differential Galois theory [5]. Finally, given any topological field k whose topology is nontrivial and nondiscrete, we define smooth functions from kn to k following [6]. We show that 𝒪⁢(n)=C∞⁢(kn,k) gives a Fermat theory. This provides the first connection between smooth functions on topological fields and differential categories.

  • [1] T. Altenkirch, J. Chapman and T. Uustalu, Monads need not be endofunctors, Logical Methods in Computer Science 11(1):3 (2012).
  • [2] R. Blute, R. Cockett and R. Seely, Differential categories, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 16(6) (2006), 1049–1083.
  • [3] P. Cohn, Universal Algebra, second ed., D. Reidel, 1981.
  • [4] E. Dubuc, A. Kock, On 1-forms classifiers, Communications in Algebra 12(12) (1984), 1471–1531.
  • [5] A. Majid, Lectures on Differential Galois Theory, American Mathematical Society, 1994.
  • [6] W. Schikhof, Ultrametric calculus, Cambridge University Press, 1985.

← Back to program