MON Β· JUL 13 Β· 16:30 Β· KRIEGER 180

Exponentiable morphisms for a clan

Joseph Hua

Joint work with: Reid Barton

Many categories, such as Top and Cat, are not locally Cartesian closed, but still have certain exponentiable morphisms [1, 2]. We propose a more fine-grained condition of being exponentiable relative to a clan [5].

A clan (π’ž,β„›) consists of a category π’ž with a class of maps β„› whose members are called β„›-maps, such that pullbacks of β„›-maps along all morphisms exist and are β„›-maps, all isomorphisms are in β„›, and β„› is closed under composition. Modifying the original definition in [5], we do not require that π’ž has a terminal object, nor that maps to the terminal object are β„›-maps. Following [5], we use ℛ⁒(X) to denote the full subcategory of the slice π’ž/X consisting of objects whose underlying map is in β„›.

Fix a clan (π’ž,β„›) and f:Yβ†’X a morphism in π’ž with all pullbacks, and such that for any pullback fβ€²:Yβ€²β†’Xβ€² of f, the restricted pullback functor (fβ€²)βˆ—:ℛ⁒(Xβ€²)→ℛ⁒(Yβ€²) has a right adjoint fβˆ—β€²:ℛ⁒(Yβ€²)→ℛ⁒(Xβ€²). We say the Beck–Chevalley condition holds at f if every pullback of f induces a canonical isomorphism:

Yβ€²YXβ€²Xsβ€²fβ€²

⌟

fs
βŸΉβ„›β’(Yβ€²)ℛ⁒(Y)ℛ⁒(Xβ€²)ℛ⁒(X)fβˆ—β€²β‰…(sβ€²)βˆ—fβˆ—sβˆ—

We say the partial right adjoint condition holds at f:Y→X when there is a bijection of hom-sets

Homπ’ž/Y⁑(fβˆ—β’Xβ€²,A)β‰…Homπ’ž/X⁑(Xβ€²,fβˆ—β’A)

natural in Xβ€²βˆˆ(π’ž/X)π—ˆπ—‰ and Aβˆˆβ„›β’(Y). Note that this is stronger than fβˆ— merely being right adjoint to the restricted functor fβˆ—:ℛ⁒(X)→ℛ⁒(Y).

Theorem 1.

The following are equivalent. (i) The Beck–Chevalley condition holds at all pullbacks of f. (i⁒i) The partial right adjoint condition holds at all pullbacks of f. (i⁒i⁒i) The partial right adjoint condition holds at f and the pushforward functor (in presheaves) Ξ f:π’ž^/Yβ†’π’ž^/X preserves (Yoneda images of) β„›-maps.

The map f:Yβ†’X is called β„›-exponentiable if it satisfies the equivalent conditions in Theorem 1. Note that f itself need not belong to β„›. When π’ž has finite limits, this notion is a special case of properness with respect to a fibration over π’ž [6], namely the fibration corresponding to the indexed category ℛ⁒(βˆ’). A prototypical example is π’ž=Top and β„› the class of local homeomorphisms, so that ℛ⁒(X)≃Sh⁒(X). Then the proper base change theorem [3] says that proper maps are β„›-exponentiable. An example of similar flavor: in π’ž=Cat, discrete fibrations are exponentiable with respect to the clan structure of discrete opfibrations (and vice versa). A different flavor of example is given by the category of simplicial sets with β„› the class of Kan fibrations: the β„›-exponentiable maps are exactly the sharp maps of Rezk [4].

  • [1] Niefield, S. Cartesianness: topological spaces, uniform spaces, and affine schemes. Journal Of Pure And Applied Algebra. 23, 147-167 (1982).
  • [2] Giraud, J. MΓ©thode de la descente. (SociΓ©tΓ© mathΓ©matique de France, 1964).
  • [3] Stacks project authors, T. The Stacks project. (2025), stacks.math.columbia.edu.
  • [4] Rezk, C. Fibrations and homotopy colimits of simplicial sheaves. ArXiv Preprint Math/9811038. (1998)
  • [5] Joyal, A. Notes on Clans and Tribes. (2017), arXiv:1710.10238
  • [6] Anel, M. & Weinberger, J. Smooth and proper maps with respect to a fibration. MSCS special issue β€œAdvances in Homotopy Type Theory”. (2025)

← Back to program